Helicobacter pylori utilises urea for amino acid synthesis
FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, ISSN: 0928-8244, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 87-94
1996
- 73Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations73
- Citation Indexes73
- CrossRef73
- 73
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 26
Article Description
Helicobacter pylori has one of the highest urease activities of all known bacteria. Its enzymatic production of ammonia protects the organism from acid damage by gastric juice. The possibility that the urease activity allows the bacterium to utilise urea as a nitrogen source for the synthesis of amino acids was investigated. H. pylori (NCTC 11638) was incubated with 50 mM urea, enriched to 5 atom% excess 15 N, that is the excess enrichment of 15 N above the normal background, in the presence of either NaCl pH 6.0, or 0.2M citrate pH 6.0. E. coli (NCTC 9001) was used as a urease-negative control. 15 N enrichment was detected by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. H. pylori showed intracellular incorporation of 15 N in the presence of citrate buffer pH 6.0 but there was no significant incorporation of 15 N in unbuffered saline or by E. coli in either pH 6.0 citrate buffer or unbuffered saline. The intracellular fate of the urea-nitrogen was determined by means of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry following incubation with 15 N enriched 5 mM urea in the presence of either 0.2 M citrate buffer pH 6.0 or 0.2 M acetate buffer pH 6.0. After 5 min incubation in either buffer the 15 n label appeared in glutamate, glutamine, phenylalanine, aspartate and alanine. It appears, therefore, that at pH and urea concentrations typical of the gastric mucosal surface, H. pylori utilises exogenous urea as a nitrogen source for amino acid synthesis. The ammonia produced by H. pylori urease activity thus facilitates the organism's nitrogen metabolism at neutral pH as well as protecting it from acid damage at low pH.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0928824495000887; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0928-8244(95)00088-7; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0030058092&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.1996.tb00220.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8821403; https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00220.x; http://academic.oup.com/femspd/article-pdf/13/1/87/19279463/13-1-87.pdf; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1016/0928-8244(95)00088-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.1996.tb00220.x; https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/13/1/87/540667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0928-8244%2895%2900088-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0928-8244%2895%2900088-7
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know