Gamma-ray burst optical afterglow and redshift selection effects: The learning curve effect at work
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, ISSN: 1745-3933, Vol: 393, Issue: 1, Page: L65-L69
2009
- 15Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Letter Description
We show how the observed gamma-ray burst (GRB) optical afterglow (OA) and redshift distributions are changing in time from selection effects. For a subset of Swift triggered long-duration bursts, we show that the mean time taken to acquire spectroscopic redshifts for a GRB OA has evolved to shorter times. We identify a strong correlation between the mean time taken to acquire a spectroscopic redshift and the measured redshift. This correlation reveals that shorter response times favour smaller redshift bursts. This is compelling evidence for a selection effect that biases longer response times with relatively brighter high-redshift bursts. Conversely, for shorter response times, optically fainter bursts that are relatively closer are bright enough for spectroscopic redshifts to be acquired. This selection effect could explain why the average redshift, (z) ≈ 2.8 measured in 2005, has evolved to (z)≈ 2, by mid 2008. Understanding these selection effects provides an important tool for separating the contributions of intrinsically faint bursts, those obscured by host galaxy dust and bursts not seen in the optical because their OAs are observed at late times. The study highlights the importance of rapid response telescopes capable of spectroscopy, and identifies a new redshift selection effect that has not been considered previously, namely the response time to measure the redshift. © 2008 The Author. Journal compilation © 2008 RAS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78049518554&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00601.x; https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article/393/1/L65/1056508; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00601.x; http://mnrasl.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00601.x; https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-pdf/393/1/L65/3613200/393-1-L65.pdf; http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3443; https://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.3443; https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3443v1; http://mnrasl.oxfordjournals.org/content/393/1/L65; https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/9b257b36-4f2c-4d39-adbd-c44074a3f50b; https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/gamma-ray-burst-optical-afterglow-and-redshift-selection-effects-; http://mnrasl.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00601.x; http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/gammaray-burst-optical-afterglow-and-redshift-selection-effects--the-learning-curve-effect-at-work(9b257b36-4f2c-4d39-adbd-c44074a3f50b).html; https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00601.x; https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/gammaray-burst-optical-afterglow-and-redshift-selection-effects--the-learning-curve-effect-at-work(9b257b36-4f2c-4d39-adbd-c44074a3f50b).html
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know