Provincial disparities in post-reform China
China and World Economy, ISSN: 1671-2234, Vol: 18, Issue: 2, Page: 73-95
2010
- 16Citations
- 461Usage
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Using conventional and novel techniques, the present paper analyzes the main characteristics of Chinese provincial disparities during the reform period, specifically between 1978 and 2007. After dismissing the presence of spatial dependence, three main results are obtained: first, provincial inequalities have basically followed a " V" trend; second, grouping China into three large regions shows that inequality mainly lies within each region, particularly in coastal areas; and third, the analysis of intra-distribution dynamics reveals that, although there was some significant mobility in provincial relative income, particularly until 1990, the whole period persistence in the ranking of income levels is a major feature. This might provoke some changes in the policy approach to dealing with spatial disparities. © 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © 2010 Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77951762734&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124x.2010.01190.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2010.01190.x; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2010.01190.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1749-124X.2010.01190.x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124x.2010.01190.x; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1571803; https://ssrn.com/abstract=1571803
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know