PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, ISSN: 1365-2842, Vol: 45, Issue: 11, Page: 837-844
2018
  • 835
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 1,356
    Captures
  • 9
    Mentions
  • 107
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    835
  • Captures
    1,356
  • Mentions
    9
    • News Mentions
      8
      • News
        8
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
  • Social Media
    107
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      107
      • Facebook
        107

Most Recent News

Parental Sociodemographic Characteristics and Bruxism’s Risk Factors Among Children: Saudi Arabian Evaluation

Introduction Bruxism is defined as the repetitive movement of the masticatory muscles that involves grinding and clenching the teeth and/or bracing or thrusting the mandible.1

Article Description

In 2013, consensus was obtained on a definition of bruxism as repetitive masticatory muscle activity characterised by clenching or grinding of the teeth and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible and specified as either sleep bruxism or awake bruxism. In addition, a grading system was proposed to determine the likelihood that a certain assessment of bruxism actually yields a valid outcome. This study discusses the need for an updated consensus and has the following aims: (i) to further clarify the 2013 definition and to develop separate definitions for sleep and awake bruxism; (ii) to determine whether bruxism is a disorder rather than a behaviour that can be a risk factor for certain clinical conditions; (iii) to re-examine the 2013 grading system; and (iv) to develop a research agenda. It was concluded that: (i) sleep and awake bruxism are masticatory muscle activities that occur during sleep (characterised as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterised by repetitive or sustained tooth contact and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively; (ii) in otherwise healthy individuals, bruxism should not be considered as a disorder, but rather as a behaviour that can be a risk (and/or protective) factor for certain clinical consequences; (iii) both non-instrumental approaches (notably self-report) and instrumental approaches (notably electromyography) can be employed to assess bruxism; and (iv) standard cut-off points for establishing the presence or absence of bruxism should not be used in otherwise healthy individuals; rather, bruxism-related masticatory muscle activities should be assessed in the behaviour's continuum.

Bibliographic Details

F. Lobbezoo; P. Wetselaar; J. Ahlberg; K. G. Raphael; V. Santiago; A. G. Glaros; T. Kato; E. Winocur; A. De Laat; R. De Leeuw; K. Koyano; G. J. Lavigne; P. Svensson; D. Manfredini

Wiley

Dentistry

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know