Anti‐factor IIa (FIIa) heparin assay for patients on direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, ISSN: 1538-7836, Vol: 18, Issue: 7, Page: 1653-1660
2020
- 5Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef2
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are increasingly prescribed for outpatients, and those transitioning to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for hospital admission are monitored via an anti‐FXa assay. Because of assay interference, UFH results would often be critically elevated, confounding dosing. An anti‐factor IIa (FIIa) UFH assay was evaluated for clinical use. The BIOPHEN ANTI‐IIa (Aniara Diagnostica) assay and anti‐FXa INNOVANCE Heparin assay (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH) were compared on the Siemens BCS XP system. Samples included UFH controls and calibrators and specimens from patients transitioning from apixaban or rivaroxaban to UFH. Method comparison, linearity, recovery, precision, and interference by direct FXa inhibitors were evaluated. The effect of the BIOPHEN ANTI‐IIa assay on the rate of critically high UFH results was retrospectively reviewed 4 months after implementation. Accuracy studies using 0.24 and 0.50 IU/mL UFH yielded means and standard deviations of 0.26 ± 0.01 and 0.58 ± 0.01 IU/mL, respectively. Within‐run and between‐run coefficients of variation were 4.6% and 15.5% for the low control, and 1.8% and 10.6% for the high control. The method comparison slope was 0.9965 ( r 2 = 0.9468). The linear range was 0.1 to 1.3 IU/mL. The assay measured UFH in the presence of 192 ng/mL apixaban or 158 ng/mL rivaroxaban. Introduction of the assay for clinical use reduced the monthly percentage of critically high results from 9.4% to 3.8% for admitted heparinized patients who recently discontinued apixaban or rivaroxaban. The BIOPHEN ANTI‐IIa assay is suitable for patients transitioning off apixaban or rivaroxaban.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538783622013241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14806; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085066391&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216028; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1538783622013241; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.14806; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jth.14806
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know