Anticoagulation in thrombocytopenic patients – Time to rethink?
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, ISSN: 1538-7836, Vol: 20, Issue: 9, Page: 1951-1956
2022
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
One of the difficult clinical situations in the anticoagulation era is how to give these medications to patients with significantly reduced platelet counts. The concern is the heightened bleeding risk, and the current practice is to apply a certain platelet count threshold below which the use of anticoagulant is deemed unsafe. However, this is not an evidence‐based approach especially because the thresholds arose from studies in patients with acute leukemia. In this forum article, we discuss the bleeding risk estimation in thrombocytopenic patients when the decreased counts may not be related to marrow underproduction and aim to identify possible markers which can help in this risk estimation beyond platelet counts. We exhort future studies to include a combination of these markers, which may then guide us to administer safe anticoagulation in patients with severe thrombocytopenia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153878362202102X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.15789; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133095966&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35716055; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S153878362202102X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.15789
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know