Transgrade Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Technique for Three Different Anatomical Barriers: A Case Series
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, ISSN: 1094-7159, Vol: 24, Issue: 4, Page: 763-768
2021
- 3Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Case Description
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is an effective treatment for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and post-surgical neuropathic pain. However, some patients have surgical and anatomical conditions that are contraindications to traditional DRGS technique. A novel transgrade approach to DRGS placement has been described and demonstrated effective for post spine surgery patients. We present three patients, each with a different reason in which DRGS would not be accessible via the traditional anterograde approach, who all had successful DRGS transgrade placement. The case series includes three patients with either CRPS or post-surgical neuropathic pain who had an anatomical or post-surgical condition that historically would have rendered DRGS contraindicated. Two patients had previously failed dorsal column stimulation. All three patients had successful placement with the transgrade approach—entry into the contralateral epidural space at the level of the targeted foramen from a cephalad angle. Each patient gave their verbal and written consent to be included in the case series. Following treatment with a transgrade approach, all three patients had significant pain relief and improvement in function without complication. Barriers to anterograde foraminal access including previous implantation, previous instrumentation, and epidural adhesions may prevent DRGS placement in certain indicated patients. This can be especially challenging in patients who have failed other neuromodulation options like dorsal column stimulation. Our case series demonstrated that the transgrade technique can be successfully used in these cases to increase access to DRGS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094715921000167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13276; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090462988&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909321; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1094715921000167; https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13276
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know