Malice Magazine: machete fencing and its aesthetic and pedagogical practice records
Cuadernos de Musica, Artes Visuales y Artes Escenicas, ISSN: 2215-9959, Vol: 18, Issue: 1, Page: 80-109
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The article analyzes and compares written records that Afro-descendant peasant teachers, especially from Cauca, make in the process of teaching grima or fencing with machete and a walking stick. On the one hand, paper records that are traditionally used in this practice and that grant the holder recognition as a master of the art. On the other hand, annotations on the ground used by master Ananías Caniquí as part of his training method. Considered in their aesthetic, technical, historical and philosophical value, these records account for sharp codifications of body movements, forms of attack and defense, as well as the complexity of the process of transmission of the grima and the strict ethical agreements between teacher and student. This work is based on ethnographic work accompanying training and dissemination work in several communities of Cauca, as well as on a study of several documents available on the subject.
Bibliographic Details
Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know