High pressure generation using underwater explosion of a spiral explosive in a conical vessel
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME, ISSN: 0094-9930, Vol: 126, Issue: 2, Page: 258-263
2004
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Review Description
An explosive configuration was studied so that the underwater shock wave converges at the tip of the explosive, and a three-dimensional spiral configuration was obtained. This spiral configuration need to be analyzed theoretically due to the relation of propagation velocity of underwater shock wave, detonation velocity of the explosive and a configuration of vessel to charge the explosive. In order to study an effect of the convergence, pressure measurement at the spiral center was carried out by using a manganin gauge. Therefore, when SEP was used in this experiment, the maximum pressure value was 17.7 GPa. This maximum pressure value is higher than the pressure value of underwater shock wave generated from the underwater explosion of a straight configuration. Furthermore, this maximum pressure value was higher than C-J pressure of SEP. An initial pressure of underwater shock water shock wave that can obtain from an isentropic expansion curve of SEP and a characteristic curve of water is 5.7 GPa, and C-J pressure of SEP is 15.9 GPa. From the above-mentioned, the effect of spiral convergence could be shown well.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=11144277291&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1687385; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pressurevesseltech/article/126/2/258/446257/High-Pressure-Generation-Using-Underwater; http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pressurevesseltech/article-pdf/126/2/258/5599778/258_1.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.1687385; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pressurevesseltech/article-abstract/126/2/258/446257/High-Pressure-Generation-Using-Underwater?redirectedFrom=fulltext
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know