Parameterization of large variability using the hyper-dual meta-model
Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, ISSN: 2377-2166, Vol: 3, Issue: 1
2018
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
One major problem in the design of aerospace components is the nonlinear changes in the response due to a change in the geometry and material properties. Many of these components have small nominal values and any change can lead to a large variability. In order to characterize this large variability, traditional methods require either many simulation runs or the calculations of many higher-order derivatives. Each of these paths requires a large amount of computational power to evaluate the response curve. In order to perform uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis, even more simulation runs are required. The hyper-dual meta-model (HDM) is introduced and used to characterize the response curve with the use of basis functions. The information of the response is generated with the utilization of the hyper-dual (HD) step to determine the sensitivities at a few number of simulation runs to greatly enrich the response space. This paper shows the accuracy of this method for two different systems with parameterizations at different stages in the design analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068864008&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4040476; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/verification/article/doi/10.1115/1.4040476/369068/Parameterization-of-Large-Variability-Using-the; http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/verification/article-pdf/doi/10.1115/1.4040476/6381958/vvuq_003_01_011001.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4040476; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/verification/article-abstract/3/1/011001/369068/Parameterization-of-Large-Variability-Using-the?redirectedFrom=fulltext
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know