Comparisons of different wind power forecasting systems
ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ESDA2010, Vol: 1, Page: 105-113
2010
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Wind forecasting models are divided in two main categories, physical and statistical. The former are based on Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP). The statistical models, on the other hand, use on-line measurements. In this paper we use hybrid models, which combine elements of both types. In particular three forecast systems based on Artificial Neural Networks have been developed in order to predict power production of a wind farm in different time horizons: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours. In the first forecast system, the neural network has been used only as a statistic model based on time series of on-line measured wind power, while in the second and third forecast systems different combinations of measured data and numerical weather predictions have been used, improving the performance in the predictions, especially over long time horizons. The error of the different forecast systems is investigated for various forecasting horizons and statistical distributions of the error are calculated and presented. © 2010 by ASME.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79956159076&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/esda2010-24262; http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1617962; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ESDA/proceedings/ESDA2010/49156/105/349920; http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ESDA/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/ESDA2010-24262/2718038/105_1.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/esda2010-24262; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ESDA/proceedings-abstract/ESDA2010/49156/105/349920
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know