Optimization of geometrically trimmed b-spline surfaces
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Computers and Information in Engineering Division, CED, Vol: 10, Page: 165-171
2005
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
Unlike the visual trimming of B-spline surfaces, which hides unwanted portions in rendering, the geometric trimming approach provides a mathematically clean representation without redundancy. However, the process may lead to significant deviation from the corresponding portion on the original surface. Optimization is required to minimize approximation errors and obtain higher accuracy. In this paper, we describe the application of a novel global optimization method, so-called hybrid Parallel Tempering (PT) and Simulated Annealing (SA) method, for the minimization of B-spline surface representation errors. The high degree of freedom within the configuration of B-spline surfaces as well as the "rugged" landscapes of objective functions complicate the error minimization process. The hybrid PT/SA method, which is an effective algorithm to overcome the slow convergence, waiting dilemma, and initial value sensitivity, is a good candidate for optimizing geometrically trimmed B-spline surfaces. Examples of application to geometrically trimmed wing components are presented and discussed. Our preliminary results confirm our expectation. Copyright © 2005 by ASME.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33645030794&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2005-81862; http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1580265; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings/IMECE2005/42142/165/309513; http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/IMECE2005-81862/2632052/165_1.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2005-81862; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IMECE/proceedings-abstract/IMECE2005/42142/165/309513
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know