Surface energy engineering for LiTaO and α-quartz SiO for low temperature (<220 °c) wafer bonding
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films, ISSN: 1520-8559, Vol: 37, Issue: 4
2019
- 7Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Wafer bonding can be substituted for heteroepitaxy when manufacturing specific heterojunction-based devices. Devices manufactured using wafer bonding include multijunction solar cells, integrated sensors, heterogeneously integrated photonic devices on Si (such as high-performance laser diodes), Mach-Zehnder modulators, photodetectors, optical filters, and surface acoustic wave devices. In these devices, creating heterointerfaces between different semiconductors with heavily mismatched lattice constants and/or significant thermal expansion mismatch presents significant challenges for heteroepitaxial growth. High costs and poor yields in heavily mismatched heteroepitaxy can be addressed by wafer bonding in these optoelectronic devices and sensors, including the LiTaO/Si and LiTaO/SiO heterostructures. In the present work, heterostructure formation between piezoelectric LiTaO (100) and Si (100) and α-quartz SiO (100) is investigated via wafer bonding. Direct bonding is selected instead of heteroepitaxy due to a significant thermal expansion mismatch between LiTaO and Si-based materials. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of LiTaO is 18.3 × 10/K. This is 1 order of magnitude larger than the CTE for Si, 2.6-2.77 × 10/K and 25-30 times larger than the CTE for fused SiO and quartz (which ranges 0.54-0.76 × 10/K). Thus, even at 200 °C, a 4 in. LiTaO/Si bonded pair would delaminate with LiTaO expanding 300 μm in length while Si would expand only by 40 μm. Therefore, direct wafer bonding of LiTaO/Si and LiTaO/SiO is investigated with low temperature (T < 500 K) Nano-Bonding™, which uses surface energy engineering (SEE). SEE is guided by fast, high statistics surface energy measurements using three liquid contact angle analysis, the van Oss/van Oss-Chaudhury-Good theory, and a new, fast Drop Reflection Operative Program analysis algorithm. Bonding hydrophobic LiTaO to hydrophilic Si or SiO is found to be more effective than hydrophilic LiTaO to hydrophobic Si or SiO temperatures for processing LiTaO are limited by thermal decomposition LiTaO into TaO at T ≥ 180 °C due to Li out-diffusion as much as by LiTaO fractures due to thermal mismatch.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know