A Scaffolded Approach to Laboratory Report Writing for Non-Major and Introductory Physics Classes
Physics Teacher, ISSN: 1943-4928, Vol: 59, Issue: 6, Page: 488-490
2021
- 3Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Laboratory report assignments for non-major and introductory classes can be challenging because the students are unfamiliar with the type of technical writing required and the subject matter. These issues for the student make the grading for the instructor difficult and time consuming. Determining the level of detail to require, the format, and how to distribute the grading between good writing and physics knowledge is a difficult balancing act. Many courses use laboratory reports to assess if a student can communicate scientific concepts effectively so ignoring the writing issues is not an option, but many students have no experience reading technical documents, let alone writing them. Furthermore, the students need to understand the scientific concepts to effectively communicate them. In this article, a method for providing a scaffolded approach to lab reports is given. This approach aims to provide the student with some much needed examples of technical writing while they are new to the laboratory environment and the course material. A sample lab report template was provided with key information and conclusions removed. As the course continued, the students were required to do an increasing amount of independent writing while the provided content was slowly decreased. By the end of the course the students submitted full independently written lab reports.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know