The intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech: Effects of context, age, and hearing loss
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, ISSN: 0001-4966, Vol: 139, Issue: 1, Page: 455-465
2016
- 19Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef16
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Temporal constraints on the perception of interrupted speech were investigated by comparing the intelligibility of speech that was periodically gated (PG) and subsequently either temporally compressed (PG) by concatenating remaining speech fragments or temporally expanded (PG) by doubling the silent intervals between speech fragments. Experiment 1 examined the effects of PG and PG at different gating rates (0.5 -16 Hz) on the intelligibility of words and sentences for young normal-hearing adults. In experiment 2, older normal-hearing (ONH) and older hearing-impaired (OHI) adults were tested with sentences only. The results of experiment 1 indicated that sentences were more intelligible than words. In both experiments, PG sentences were less intelligible than either PG or PG sentences. Compared with PG sentences, the intelligibility of PG sentences was significantly reduced by the same amount for ONH and OHI groups. Temporal alterations tended to produce a U-shaped rate-intelligibility function with a dip at 2-4 Hz, indicating that temporal alterations interacted with the duration of speech fragments. The present findings demonstrate that both aging and hearing loss negatively affect the overall intelligibility of interrupted and temporally altered speech. However, a mild-to-moderate hearing loss did not exacerbate the negative effects of temporal alterations associated with aging.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84956675968&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4939891; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26827039; https://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article/139/1/455/673013/The-intelligibility-of-interrupted-and-temporally; http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/139/1/10.1121/1.4939891; http://scitation.aip.org/limit_exceeded.html
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know