Effect of ambisonic order on spatial release from masking
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, ISSN: 1520-8524, Vol: 156, Issue: 4, Page: 2169-2176
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In two experiments, spatial release from masking (SRM) was measured using an ambisonic reproduction system for a range of different ambisonic orders. The first experiment used ambisonic panning while the second experiment used impulse responses recorded from a sixth-order ambisonic microphone. Both experiments found a progressive increase in SRM with increasing ambisonic order for speech presented against a single speech-shaped-noise interferer. SRM increased progressively up to at least fourth order and continued to asymptotically improve at higher-ambisonic orders toward the level achieved with point sources. The second experiment found that this effect was robust for different acoustic environments.
Bibliographic Details
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know