C Activity and Global Carbon Cycle Changes over the Past 50,000 Years
Science, ISSN: 0036-8075, Vol: 303, Issue: 5655, Page: 202-207
2004
- 407Citations
- 343Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations407
- Citation Indexes405
- 405
- CrossRef377
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures343
- Readers343
- 343
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent Blog
Rextinct: a new tool to estimate when a species went extinct
If several fossils of an extinct population or species are dated, we can estimate how long ago the extinction event took place. In our new paper, we describe CRIWM, a new method to estimate extinction time using times series of fossils whose ages have been measured by radiocarbon dating. And yes, there’s an R package — Rextinct […]
Article Description
A series of C measurements in Ocean Drilling Program cores from the tropical Cariaco Basin, which have been correlated to the annual-layer counted chronology for the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2) ice core, provides a high-resolution calibration of the radiocarbon time scale back to 50,000 years before the present. Independent radiometric dating of events correlated to GISP2 suggests that the calibration is accurate. Reconstructed C activities varied substantially during the last glacial period, including sharp peaks synchronous with the Laschamp and Mono Lake geomagnetic field intensity minimal and cosmogenic nuclide peaks in ice cores and marine sediments. Simulations with a geochemical box model suggest that much of the variability can be explained by geomagnetically modulated changes in C production rate together with plausible changes in deep-ocean ventilation and the global carbon cycle during glaciation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0346340053&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090300; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14716006; https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1090300; https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090300; https://www.science.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1090300
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know