Genetic reactivation of cone photoreceptors restores visual responses in retinitis pigmentosa
Science, ISSN: 0036-8075, Vol: 329, Issue: 5990, Page: 413-417
2010
- 551Citations
- 786Captures
- 6Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations551
- Citation Indexes533
- 533
- CrossRef499
- Patent Family Citations14
- Patent Families14
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Captures786
- Readers786
- 786
- Mentions6
- References3
- Wikipedia3
- News Mentions2
- News2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Visual treasure from the Sahara desert is no mirage
A recent study offers strong promises for curing blindness. The back of our eye features the retina, a thin sheet of cells that can transform light into an electrical impulse. Nestled within the tip of the retinal cells specialized in ? Continue reading ?
Most Recent News
Update on Optogenetics for Advanced Retinal Degenerations
Optogenetics is a technique of genetic engineering that enables cells to express photoactive proteins whose activity can be modulated using light. Although the groundwork for
Review Description
Retinitis pigmentosa refers to a diverse group of hereditary diseases that lead to incurable blindness, affecting two million people worldwide. As a common pathology, rod photoreceptors die early, whereas light-insensitive, morphologically altered cone photoreceptors persist longer. It is unknown if these cones are accessible for therapeutic intervention. Here, we show that expression of archaebacterial halorhodopsin in light-insensitive cones can substitute for the native phototransduction cascade and restore light sensitivity in mouse models of retinitis pigmentosa. Resensitized photoreceptors activate all retinal cone pathways, drive sophisticated retinal circuit functions (including directional selectivity), activate cortical circuits, and mediate visually guided behaviors. Using human ex vivo retinas, we show that halorhodopsin can reactivate light-insensitive human photoreceptors. Finally, we identified blind patients with persisting, light-insensitive cones for potential halorhodopsin-based therapy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954847711&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1190897; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20576849; https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1190897; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/4502958#eval4359056; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.4502958.4359056; https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1190897; http://f1000.com/4502958#eval4359056; http://science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1190897; http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5990/413; http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5990/413.abstract; http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5990/413.full.pdf; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/20576849; http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1190897; http://science.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1190897; https://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5990/413; https://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5990/413.abstract; https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/329/5990/413.full.pdf; https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1190897
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know