A cinematic view of tissue microbiology in the live infected host
Bacteria and Intracellularity, Page: 315-324
2020
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
With each big scientific advancement, plaudits are quickly heaped on the scientists producing these great results as well as recognizing those that came before. Emerging technologies and technological advancements, often crucial to these ground-breaking discoveries, are often overlooked as merely being tools. Each big step forward in our understanding of host-pathogen interaction has been enabled in some way by advancements in technology. These advancements have allowed scientists to look at their problems in a new light, given us more detailed read-outs, or pushed us further toward the clinical environment. Microscopy is a clear example of these types of advancements. The development of the first primitive microscope in the 1670s allowed Antoine van Leeuwenhoek to describe the “animalcules” he saw, which were, in fact, bacteria being visualized for the first time using light-based microscopy (1, 2).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101471766&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/9781683670261.ch22; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1128/9781683670261.ch22; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1128/9781683670261.ch22/fullpdf; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1128%2F9781683670261.ch22; https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/9781683670261.ch22; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1128/9781683670261.ch22
American Society for Microbiology
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know