Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, ISSN: 0893-8512, Vol: 24, Issue: 4, Page: 718-733
2011
- 1,732Citations
- 2,572Captures
- 25Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1,732
- Citation Indexes1,667
- 1,667
- CrossRef1,109
- Policy Citations65
- Policy Citation65
- Captures2,572
- Readers2,572
- 2,572
- Mentions25
- News Mentions20
- News20
- References4
- Wikipedia4
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent News
Genomic characteristics of clinical non-toxigenic Vibrio cholerae isolates in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study
Original article Vol. 154 No. 4 (2024) Summary STUDY AIMS: Although non-toxigenic Vibrio cholerae lack the ctxAB genes encoding cholera toxin, they can cause diarrhoeal disease and outbreaks in
Article Description
Antimicrobials are valuable therapeutics whose efficacy is seriously compromised by the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. The provision of antibiotics to food animals encompasses a wide variety of nontherapeutic purposes that include growth promotion. The concern over resistance emergence and spread to people by nontherapeutic use of antimicrobials has led to conflicted practices and opinions. Considerable evidence supported the removal of nontherapeutic antimicrobials (NTAs) in Europe, based on the "precautionary principle." Still, concrete scientific evidence of the favorable versus unfavorable consequences of NTAs is not clear to all stakeholders. Substantial data show elevated antibiotic resistance in bacteria associated with animals fed NTAs and their food products. This resistance spreads to other animals and humans-directly by contact and indirectly via the food chain, water, air, and manured and sludge-fertilized soils. Modern genetic techniques are making advances in deciphering the ecological impact of NTAs, but modeling efforts are thwarted by deficits in key knowledge of microbial and antibiotic loads at each stage of the transmission chain. Still, the substantial and expanding volume of evidence reporting animal-to-human spread of resistant bacteria, including that arising from use of NTAs, supports eliminating NTA use in order to reduce the growing environmental load of resistance genes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053596783&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00002-11; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976606; http://cmr.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/CMR.00002-11; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1128/CMR.00002-11; https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/CMR.00002-11; https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00002-11; http://cmr.asm.org/lookup/doi/10.1128/CMR.00002-11; https://cmr.asm.org/content/24/4/718; https://cmr.asm.org/content/24/4/718.abstract; https://cmr.asm.org/content/24/4/718.full.pdf; https://cmr.asm.org/content/cmr/24/4/718.full.pdf; http://cmr.asm.org/content/24/4/718; https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/CMR.00002-11
American Society for Microbiology
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know