Diversity and versatility of the Thermotoga maritima sugar kinome
Journal of Bacteriology, ISSN: 0021-9193, Vol: 194, Issue: 20, Page: 5552-5563
2012
- 24Citations
- 19Usage
- 39Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef18
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Sugar phosphorylation is an indispensable committed step in a large variety of sugarcatabolic pathways, which are major suppliers of carbon and energy in heterotrophic species. Specialized sugar kinases that are indispensable for most of these pathways can be utilized as signature enzymes for the reconstruction of carbohydrate utilization machinery from microbial genomic and metagenomic data. Sugar kinases occur in several structurally distinct families with various partially overlapping as well as yet unknown substrate specificities that often cannot be accurately assigned by homology-based techniques. A subsystems-based metabolic reconstruction combined with the analysis of genome context and followed by experimental testing of predicted gene functions is a powerful approach of functional gene annotation. Here we applied this integrated approach for functional mapping ofall sugar kinases constituting an extensive and diverse sugar kinome in the thermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima. Substrate preferences of 14 kinases mainly from the FGGY and PfkB families were inferred by bioinformatics analysis and biochemically characterizedby screening with a panel of 45 different carbohydrates. Most of the analyzed enzymes displayed narrow substrate preferences corresponding to their predicted physiological roles in their respective catabolic pathways. The observed consistency supports the choice ofkinases as signature enzymes for genomics-based identification and reconstruction of sugar utilization pathways. Use of the integrated genomic and experimental approach greatly speeds up the identification of the biochemical function of unknown proteins and improves the quality of reconstructed pathways. © 2012, American Society for Microbiology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84868524371&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.01136-12; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22885293; http://jb.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/JB.01136-12; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1128/JB.01136-12; https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JB.01136-12; https://digitalcommons.hope.edu/faculty_publications/606; https://digitalcommons.hope.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1625&context=faculty_publications; https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.01136-12; https://jb.asm.org/content/194/20/5552; https://jb.asm.org/content/194/20/5552.abstract; https://jb.asm.org/content/jb/194/20/5552.full.pdf; http://jb.asm.org/content/194/20/5552; https://jb.asm.org/content/194/20/5552.full.pdf; https://journals.asm.org/doi/abs/10.1128/JB.01136-12; http://jb.asm.org/lookup/doi/10.1128/JB.01136-12
American Society for Microbiology
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know