The use of bioacoustic characters for distinguishing between cryptic species in insects: Potentials, restrictions, and prospects
Entomological Review, ISSN: 1555-6689, Vol: 94, Issue: 3, Page: 289-309
2014
- 13Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Differences in acoustic signal patterns between closely related species often form the main precopulatory reproductive barrier in insects. For this reason, discrimination between similar forms based on their signal patterns allows one to recognize reproductively isolated species. A calling signal produced by a mature male for attracting a conspecific female is a "species ID" testifying to the fact that it belongs to the same species. This is the reason why the use of the calling signal analysis for discriminating between cryptic species or elucidating the taxonomic rank of dubious forms is highly efficient. In certain species, courtship signals also show species-specific patterns. In insect taxonomy, the study of acoustic signals is most promising in morphologically or/and ecologically heterogeneous groups. Chances that any morphologically homogeneous form will actually appear to be a complex of cryptic species are low. The degree of signal variability differs in different orders, families and even congeneric species. Therefore, in every taxon investigated for the first time, it is necessary to evaluate the limits of intraspecific variability of signals before using the acoustic characters in taxonomy. Species not involved in acoustic interactions due to allopatry, different host specialization, etc. can produce calling signals with identical patterns. Consequently, similarity in the signal structure in such species is by no means evidence of their synonymy. © 2014 Pleiades Publishing, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902331486&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s0013873814030014; http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0013873814030014; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0013873814030014; https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s0013873814030014; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0013873814030014
Pleiades Publishing Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know