The South Churubash Settlement, Eastern Crimea: Earthquake-Induced Gravitational and Inertial Deformations
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology, ISSN: 1819-7108, Vol: 18, Issue: 4, Page: 366-382
2024
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Abstract: This study reports comprehensive research (archeological, archaeo- and paleo-seismological, as well as georadar profiling), which enabled us to find out the cause of destruction for the South Churubash settlement (a big manor in the chora around the town of Nymphaion) in eastern Crimea. A strong seismic event whose possible rupture went along the southwestern boundary of the Churubash Liman, which is a segment of the Parpach–Taman active fault, led to the formation of landslide bodies southwest of the rupture. The nearly north–south plane of scar for one of these has traversed the ancient settlement through its middle, having produced a visible flexure in the juvenile soil of this archeological monument—an earthquake-induced gravitational deformation. Large seismic slip at the fault plane had destroyed all structures and led to large deformations in the lower rows of the masonry: tilts, shifts, and rotations of parts of the walls—earthquake-induced inertial deformations. Considering that the earthquake rupture was nearby, and that all houses have been destroyed in the settlement, we hypothesize that the manor was caught in the epicentral zone of an ancient earthquake where the intensity of seismic motion was at least Io ≥ IX. Judging by the findings of amphorae brands, black glazed pottery, as well as of a Bosporus coin, this large manor in the chora of Nymphaion came to the end of its existence owing to a strong earthquake and a fire in the beginning of the fourth quarter of the 4th century BC. We may have previously observed traces of this earthquake in Nymphaion: as an example, the structures of Nymphaion dating back to the 5th—4th centuries BC had been completely or partly destroyed. Further surveys of active geological structures and archeological monuments would enable a more accurate parameterization of the seismic event identified in this study, which would serve the purpose of a more accurate assessment of earthquake hazard for the Crimean Peninsula.
Bibliographic Details
Pleiades Publishing Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know