Optimization of ilmenite flotation process in the presence of microwave irradiation
Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, ISSN: 1070-4272, Vol: 89, Issue: 8, Page: 1328-1335
2016
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the present study, the effect of parameters, including microwave irradiation power, pH, dosage of chemical reagents (collector, depressant and activator) were studied by microflotation (in Hallimond tube) process. The mechanical flotation tests were carried out on optimum parameters obtained from microflotation tests. The software based on experimental design method (DX7) with the two-level full factorial design was applied to determine the parameter effects and to optimize the microflotation recovery. The optimum conditions were determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA), indicating that the irradiation power was the most effective parameter. The optimum values of parameters in the microflotation process are as follows: power of microwave (1000 W), pH (6.3), dosage of chemical reagents (sodium oleate 3.65 × 10 M as a collector, acidified sodium silicate 2 g L as a depressant, and lead(II) nitrate 2.1 × 10 M as an activator). By applying these optimized parameters, a product with ilmenite recovery of 83.26% was predicted by the software. The results of microflotation tests indicated that an ilmenite recovery of 82.35% was achieved being very close to the predicted value. The results of mechanical flotation based on optimized condition showed that the recovery and separation efficiency of irradiated ilmenite were improved up to 86.03% and 48.61%, respectively, indicating the positive effect of irradiation on ilmenite floatability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84996558192&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1070427216080188; http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S1070427216080188; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S1070427216080188.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1070427216080188/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1070427216080188; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1070427216080188
Pleiades Publishing Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know