Retrospective, longitudinal, and cross sectional study of visual acuity impairment in choroideraemia
British Journal of Ophthalmology, ISSN: 0007-1161, Vol: 86, Issue: 6, Page: 658-662
2002
- 142Citations
- 56Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations142
- Citation Indexes142
- 142
- CrossRef77
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Review Description
Background/aims: Few studies have reported on the change in visual acuity (VA) in patients with choroideraemia. In order to determine the degree and rate of VA impairment associated with this disease, the central VA was analysed in a large group of patients with choroideraemia. Methods: The authors completed a retrospective, cross sectional review of 115 patients with choroideraemia from three tertiary care centres. A longitudinal analysis was performed on 45 of these patients who met the inclusion criteria of at least three visits over a minimum period of 4.5 years. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the 5 year rate of VA change while controlling for initial VA and initial age. Multiple logistic regression was also used to investigate VA impairment. Results: In the cross sectional group (n = 115), 84% (87/103) of patients under the age of 60 had a VA of 20/40 or better while 33% (4/12) of patients 60 years of age or older had a VA of 20/200 or worse at their most recent visit. The majority of the patients (93%) in the longitudinal subgroup of 45 patients had a VA of 20/30 or better at their initial visit. The mean 5 year rate of VA change was 0.09 logMAR equivalent (approximately one line on the Lighthouse chart). Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with choroideraemia, there was typically a slow rate of VA loss and the prognosis for central VA retention was, as a group, favourable until the seventh decade.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036282588&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.6.658; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12034689; https://bjo.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjo.86.6.658; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.6.658; https://bjo.bmj.com/content/86/6/658; http://bjo.bmj.com/content/86/6/658; https://bjo.bmj.com/content/86/6/658.abstract; https://bjo.bmj.com/content/86/6/658.full.pdf; https://bjo.bmj.com/content/bjophthalmol/86/6/658.full.pdf; https://bjo.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bjo.86.6.658; https://ohsu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/bf756c8a-30c2-4dd8-b324-b97b2231b8d5; http://bjo.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bjo.86.6.658; http://bjo.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjo.86.6.658
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know