Electric convulsion therapy in depression: A double-blind controlled trial
British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), ISSN: 0267-0623, Vol: 282, Issue: 6261, Page: 355-357
1981
- 101Citations
- 36Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations101
- Citation Indexes98
- CrossRef98
- 94
- Policy Citations3
- 3
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 32
- Mentions2
- References2
- 2
Article Description
The therapeutic effect of simulated and real bilateral electric convulsion therapy was examined in a double-blind, randomised trial on 22 patients with primary depressive illness. Each treatment was given twice weekly for three weeks and the results assessed by the psychiatrist using a visual analogue rating scale, nurses using a nine-point rating scale, and the patients themselves using the Beck Depression Inventory. With all three methods of assessment patients given the real treatment substantially improved (p <0-001), whereas those given simulated treatment showed little change. Three weeks after substituting real treatment for simulated, however, these patients were also significantly improved (psychiatrist‘s rating p <0.001; nurses' rating p <0.005; Beck inventory p< 0.005). These findings confirm the value of electric convulsion therapy in severe depressive illness and strongly suggest that the convulsion is important for the therapeutic effect. © 1981, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0019382876&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.282.6261.355; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6780021; https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.282.6261.355; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.282.6261.355; https://www.bmj.com/content/282/6261/355
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know