Does access to neighbourhood green space promote a healthy duration of sleep? Novel findings from a cross-sectional study of 259 319 Australians
BMJ Open, ISSN: 2044-6055, Vol: 3, Issue: 8, Page: 1-6
2013
- 148Citations
- 98Usage
- 217Captures
- 8Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations148
- Citation Indexes138
- 138
- CrossRef118
- Policy Citations10
- Policy Citation10
- Usage98
- Downloads84
- Abstract Views14
- Captures217
- Readers217
- 217
- Mentions8
- News Mentions7
- News7
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent News
Associations between Aircraft Noise Exposure and Self-Reported Sleep Duration and Quality in the United States-Based Prospective Nurses' Health Study Cohort.(Research)
Introduction Sleep is an essential, natural process needed for healthy brain and general body functioning. (1) Disruption of sleep can cause drowsiness and poor concentration
Article Description
Objectives: Experiments demonstrate that exposure to parks and other 'green spaces' promote favourable psychological and physiological outcomes. As a consequence, people who reside in greener neighbourhoods may also have a lower risk of short sleep duration (<6 h). This is potentially important as short sleep duration is a correlate of obesity, chronic disease and mortality, but so far this hypothesis has not been previously investigated. Design: Cross-sectional data analysis. Setting: New South Wales, Australia. Participants: This study investigated whether neighbourhood green space was associated with a healthier duration of sleep (to the nearest hour) among 259 319 Australians who completed the 45 and Up Study baseline questionnaire between 2006 and 2009 inclusive. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Multinomial logit regression was used to investigate the influence of an objective measure of green space on categories of sleep duration: 8 h (normal); between 9 and 10 h (mid-long sleep); over 10 h (long sleep); between 6 and 7 h (mid-short sleep); and less than 6 h (short sleep). Models were adjusted for psychological distress, physical activity and a range of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Results: People living in greener neighbourhoods reported a lower risk of short sleep. For example, compared with participants living in areas with 20% green space land-use, the relative risk ratios for participants with 80%+ green space was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.92) for durations between 6 and 7 h, and 0.68 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.80) for less than 6 h sleep. Unexpectedly, the benefit of more green space for achieving 8 h of sleep was not explained by controls for psychological distress, physical activity or other socioeconomic factors. Conclusions: Green space planning policies may have wider public health benefits than previously recognised. Further research in the role of green spaces in promoting healthier sleep durations and patterns is warranted.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84885353924&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23943772; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094; https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/1599; https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2598&context=sspapers; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/8/e003094; http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/8/e003094.abstract; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/8/e003094.full.pdf; http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/8/e003094; http://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003094; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/3/8/e003094.full.pdf
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know