Decisions about the use of psychotropic medication during pregnancy: A qualitative study
BMJ Open, ISSN: 2044-6055, Vol: 6, Issue: 1, Page: e010130
2016
- 15Citations
- 119Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- CrossRef15
- 15
- Captures119
- Readers119
- 119
Article Description
Objective: To understand the perspectives of women with severe mental illness concerning the use of psychotropic medicines while pregnant. Design: Interviews conducted by female peer researchers with personal experience of making or considering decisions about using psychotropic medicines in pregnancy, supported by professional researchers. Participants: 12 women who had had a baby in the past 5 years and had taken antipsychotics or moodstabilisers for severe mental illness within the 12-month period immediately prior to that pregnancy. Recruitment to the study was via peer networks and the women interviewed came from different regions of England. Setting: Interviews were arranged in places where women felt comfortable and that accommodated their childcare needs including their home, local library and the research office. Results: The views expressed demonstrated complex attempts to engage with decision-making about the use of psychotropic medicines in pregnancy. In nearly all cases, the women expressed the view that healthcare professionals had access to limited information leaving women to rely on experiential and common sense evidence when making decisions about medicine taking during pregnancy. Conclusions: The findings complement existing work using electronic health records by providing explanations for the discontinuation of psychotropic medicines in pregnancy. Further work is necessary to understand health professionals' perspectives on the provision of services and care to women with severe mental illness during pregnancy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84960153321&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010130; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817641; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010130; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010130; https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/1/e010130
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know