Giardia duodenalis in men who have sex with men: A systematic review
Frontline Gastroenterology, ISSN: 2041-4145, Vol: 15, Issue: 5, Page: 417-423
2024
- 1Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Objective Giardia duodenalis causes enteritis and malabsorption and can be sexually transmissible in men who have sex with men (MSM). The aim of this study was to explore factors associated with MSM with G. duodenalis. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, Global Health and Web of Science were searched for manuscripts published up to February 2024. The primary author screened manuscript titles and abstracts; two authors independently reviewed full-text manuscripts for eligibility and risk of bias. We only included manuscripts that included MSM with G. duodenalis and explored at least one risk factor or association. Narrative data were synthesised following the population of a predetermined table. Results Twelve manuscripts were included in this review, including cross-sectional studies (n=7), case series (n=3), cohort study (n=1), case-control study (n=1), from the USA (n=8), the UK (n=1), Cuba (n=1), Spain (n=1) and Canada (n=1) published between 1977 and 2024 and included 191 MSM with G. duodenalis. This review highlighted demographic (living with HIV and living with HIV with a CD4 count <400 cells/mL), biological (coinfection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Escherichia coli, Entamoeba histolytica, non-pathogenic enteric parasites, intestinal spirochaetosis, Enterobius vermicularis, previous Treponema pallidum, N. gonorrhoeae, Shigella spp, hepatitis A, E. histolytica and G. duodenalis) and behavioural (lack of anal douching, oral-anal sex, oral sex, anal sex, group sex, use of sex toys, having more than one sexual partner per week, non-condom use, being part of a sexual network or having a sexual partner with G. duodenalis) factors associated with MSM with G. duodenalis. Conclusion This review has highlighted some demographic, behavioural and biological factors associated with MSM with G. duodenalis, which provide insight for public health control strategies and future research. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023477691.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199680790&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2024-102780; https://fg.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/flgastro-2024-102780; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2024-102780; https://fg.bmj.com/content/early/2024/07/16/flgastro-2024-102780
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know