Determinants of effective heart failure self-care: A systematic review of patients' and caregivers' perceptions
Heart, ISSN: 1468-201X, Vol: 100, Issue: 9, Page: 716-721
2014
- 133Citations
- 162Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations133
- Citation Indexes129
- 129
- CrossRef74
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures162
- Readers162
- 162
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Review Description
Context Disease management interventions for heart failure (HF) are inconsistent and very seldom incorporate the views and needs of patients and their caregivers into intervention design. Objective and data To improve intervention effectiveness and consistency, a systematic review identified 49 studies which examined the views and needs of patients with HF and their caregivers about the nature and determinants of effective HF self-care. Results The findings identify key drivers of effective self-care, such as the capacity of patients to successfully integrate self-care practices with their preferred normal daily life patterns and recognise and respond to HF symptoms in a timely manner. Conclusions Future interventions for HF self-care must involve family members throughout the intervention and harness patients' normal daily routines.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898425963&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24548920; https://heart.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852; https://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fhs_pub/438; https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852; http://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fhs_pub/438; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852; https://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716; https://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.abstract; https://heart.bmj.com/content/heartjnl/100/9/716.full.pdf; http://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.abstract; https://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.full.pdf; https://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.full; http://heart.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852; https://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.long; http://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.short; http://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716; http://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.full; https://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.short; http://heart.bmj.com/content/100/9/716.long; http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304852
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know