Effect of haemodynamic changes during rapid atrial pacing on determination of sinus node recovery time
British Heart Journal, ISSN: 0007-0769, Vol: 52, Issue: 1, Page: 87-92
1984
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Arterial blood pressure was continuously monitored during rapid atrial pacing in 31 patients with different types of heart disease to determine sinus node recovery time and corrected sinus node recovery time. Pacing was initiated at 70 beats/min and increased stepwise to 160 beats/min. One to one atrioventricular conduction was maintained throughout the one minute stimulation period. Blood pressure fell initially during at least one stimulation period in 21 of our patients and at pacing rates up to 130 beats/min in 18. Once blood pressure had fallen during overdrive pacing maximal sinus node recovery time and maximal corrected sinus node recovery time could not be prolonged by increasing the pacing rate. Sinus node recovery time and corrected sinus node recovery time during the pacing induced fall in blood pressure were significantly shorter than those during stimulation runs with constant blood pressure. No pacing induced fall in blood pressure and no relation between changes in blood pressure and sinus node recovery time were evident in 10 of the 31 patients. Sinus node recovery time is therefore influenced by alterations in autonomic tone due to pacing induced haemodynamic changes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0021230363&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.52.1.87; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6743427; https://heart.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/hrt.52.1.87; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.52.1.87; https://heart.bmj.com/content/52/1/87; https://heart.bmj.com/content/52/1/87.long; https://heart.bmj.com/content/52/1/87.abstract; https://heart.bmj.com/content/heartjnl/52/1/87.full.pdf; http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/hrt.52.1.87; https://heart.bmj.com/content/52/1/87.full.pdf; https://heart.bmj.com/content/52/1/87.full; https://heart.bmj.com/content/52/1/87.short
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know