Reactive ion etching mechanism of copper film in chlorine-based electron cyclotron resonance plasma
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers and Short Notes and Review Papers, ISSN: 0021-4922, Vol: 36, Issue: 1 A, Page: 50-55
1997
- 34Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In order to investigate the reactive ion etching mechanism of the copper films in CCl/N electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) plasma, the dependences of the copper etch rate on various etching parameters, the etch products as well as their depth distributions and the concentration of chlorine radicals in the plasma were examined. It was found that the etching species in CCl plasma is not CCl but atomic chlorine (Cl) and the etch product formed at the surface of the copper film is not CuCl but CuCl. In order to carry out reactive ion etching of copper film in chlorine-based plasma the substrate temperature should be above 210°C, below which the etch product has too low vapor pressure to be volatile. At the substrate temperature above 210°C, the copper etch rate is not limited by the removal rate of the etch product but limited by its formation rate which depends on the concentration of chlorine radicals and the reaction rate between the etching species and the copper film. The etch rate is also increased by applying a negative bias to the substrate, the role of which is the enhancement of the formation rate of the etch product by activating chemical reactions due to energetic ion bombardment. Adding small amounts of CF to CCl plasma increases the etch rate dependence on ion bombardment energy by forming involatile copper fiuoride on the etched surface.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0030644568&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/jjap.36.50; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1143/JJAP.36.50; https://dx.doi.org/10.1143/jjap.36.50; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=4dfd4dc2-ef09-4614-bd7d-5ac10bc83899&ssb=12444225020&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1143%2FJJAP.36.50&ssi=daf57acb-cnvj-41aa-b8f4-8f2adc4e0c8d&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=418706703795392835921653418285719827&ssn=60ff7507d66f21cdd7a5aa86bcd7000e36ba0900c3c4-8990-4f21-ad4b37&sso=a9f0bf8c-bc564dd29deab00e9dec16c8f531c0a7f79d62864b31b267&ssp=22313339421726584983172688355729447&ssq=61562726315240652081529239289564460276320&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlNS0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzMzMzOTEzMDk2LWZlNmVjY2Q2MGRlYjEzOGU1OTE5NTgiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzMzMzOTEzMDk2LTYxNGE3ODM5OGIxNjk0Zjg1OTIwMjEifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know