When Machines Find Sites for the Archaeologists: A Preliminary Study with Semantic Segmentation applied on Satellite Imagery of the Mesopotamian Floodplain
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Page: 378-383
2022
- 3Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In the perspective of landscape archaeology, remote sensing is a very important tool that allows to recognize and locate potential sites, which will then be "groundtruthed"through a surface survey. Remote sensing is, unfortunately, a very time-consuming process that scales terribly with the size of the area under investigation. In this paper we explore the possibility of using semantic segmentation models to detect and highlight the presence of archaeological sites present in the Mesopotamian floodplain. Whereas archaeologists usually combine information from a variety of basemaps, including aerial and satellite photos taken from the 1950s onwards, we investigated the possibility of using an easily accessible online maps (in our case, Bing Maps). Trying to build an accessible and lightweight system also dictated the choice of trying pretrained segmentation models and use transfer learning. The preliminary results obtained (from different models and parameters choices), as well as the dataset, its idiosyncrasies and how we can deal with them are discussed in this paper.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know