µGeT: Multimodal eyes-free text selection technique combining touch interaction and microgestures
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Page: 594-603
2023
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
We present µGeT, a novel multimodal eyes-free text selection technique. µGeT combines touch interaction with microgestures. µGeT is especially suited for People with Visual Impairments (PVI) by expanding the input bandwidth of touchscreen devices, thus shortening the interaction paths for routine tasks. To do so, µGeT extends touch interaction (left/right and up/down flicks) using two simple microgestures: thumb touching either the index or the middle finger. For text selection, the multimodal technique allows us to directly modify the positioning of the two selection handles and the granularity of text selection. Two user studies, one with 9 PVI and one with 8 blindfolded sighted people, compared µGeT with a baseline common technique (VoiceOver like on iPhone). Despite a large variability in performance, the two user studies showed that µGeT is globally faster and yields fewer errors than VoiceOver. A detailed analysis of the interaction trajectories highlights the different strategies adopted by the participants. Beyond text selection, this research shows the potential of combining touch interaction and microgestures for improving the accessibility of touchscreen devices for PVI.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know