Automation's Not Perfect but Neither Are We: Unveiling Illusionary Control and Automation Bias in Automated Driving
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Page: 25-29
2023
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
If we want to develop automated vehicles that are truly human-centered, we need to keep in mind that our reasoning ability is far from "flawless", as we are susceptible to inherent cognitive biases. With this work, we aim to systemically investigate cognitive biases in the context of automated driving for the first time. Using an online study (N = 99) and a short experiment (N = 21), we investigated two exemplary cognitive biases (1. illusion of control and 2. automation bias). Our results suggest that both can occur during automated driving. Specifically, we found that not only a greater amount of information about vehicle behavior but also the humanization of this information can lead to an (illusory) higher sense of control.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know