A Comparative Analysis of Transformer-based Protein Language Models for Remote Homology Prediction
ACM-BCB 2023 - 14th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics, Page: 1-9
2023
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Protein language models based on the transformer architecture are increasingly shown to learn rich representations from protein sequences that improve performance on a variety of downstream protein prediction tasks. These tasks encompass a wide range of predictions, including prediction of secondary structure, subcellular localization, evolutionary relationships within protein families, as well as superfamily and family membership. There is recent evidence that such models also implicitly learn structural information. In this paper we put this to the test on a hallmark problem in computational biology, remote homology prediction. We employ a rigorous setting, where, by lowering sequence identity, we clarify whether the problem of remote homology prediction has been solved. Among various interesting findings, we report that current state-of-the-art, large models are still underperforming in the "twilight zone"of very low sequence identity.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know