A meta-analysis of enteral nutrition and total parenteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis
Gastroenterology Research and Practice, ISSN: 1687-6121, Vol: 2011, Page: 698248
2011
- 30Citations
- 58Usage
- 62Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef21
- Usage58
- Abstract Views58
- Captures62
- Readers62
- 62
Article Description
Objective. To analyze the effect of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral nutrition (EN) in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods. Randomized controlled trials of TPN and EN in patients with acute pancreatitis were searched in NCBI and CBM databases and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Six studies were enrolled into the analysis, and the details about the trial designs, characters of the subjects, results of the studies were reviewed by two independent authors and analyzed by STATA 11.0 software. Results. Compared with TPN, EN was associated with a significantly lower incidence of pancreatic infection complications (RR=0.556, 95% CI 0.436∼0.709, P=.000), MOF (RR=0.395, 95% CI 0.272∼0.573, P=.003), surgical interventions (RR=0.556, 95% CI 0.436∼0.709, P=.000), and mortality (RR=0.426, 95% CI 0.238∼0.764, P=.167). There was no statistic significance in non-pancreatitis-related complications (RR=0.853, 95% CI 0.4901.483, P=.017). However, EN had a significantly higher incidence of non-infection-related complications (RR=2.697, 95% CI 1.947∼3.735, P=.994). Conclusion. EN could be the preferred nutrition feeding method in patients with acute pancreatitis. Copyright © 2011 Heming Quan et al.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80052689358&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/698248; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21687619; http://www.hindawi.com/journals/grp/2011/698248/; https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/P20161005001-201112-201610060003-201610060003-288-296; https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/698248; https://www.hindawi.com/journals/grp/2011/698248/
Hindawi Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know