Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review.
Obstetrics and gynecology international, ISSN: 1687-9597, Vol: 2011, Page: 852061
2011
- 39Citations
- 113Usage
- 84Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations39
- Citation Indexes37
- CrossRef37
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Usage113
- Abstract Views112
- Downloads1
- Captures84
- Readers84
- 84
- Mentions3
- References2
- Wikipedia2
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Robotic Assisted Surgery for Treatment of Gynecological Diseases: Pilot Study
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Robotic Assisted Surgery for Treatment of Gynecological Diseases: Pilot Study CURRENT STATUS: Completed STUDY TYPE: Interventional SPONSOR AGENCY:SOFAR S.p.A.CLASS:Industry TRACKING INFORMATION
Article Description
The introduction of da Vinci Robotic Surgery to the field of Gynecology has resulted in large changes in surgical management. The robotic platform allows less experienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform more complex procedures. In general gynecology and reproductive gynecology, the robot is being increasingly used for procedures such as hysterectomies, myomectomies, adnexal surgery, and tubal anastomosis. Among urogynecology the robot is being utilized for sacrocolopexies. In the field of gynecologic oncology, the robot is being increasingly used for hysterectomies and lymphadenectomies in oncologic diseases. Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of robotic surgery in gynecology, there are no randomized trials comparing its efficacy and safety to other traditional surgical approaches. Our aim is to update previously published reviews with a focus on only comparative observational studies. We determined that, with the right amount of training and skill, along with appropriate patient selection, robotic surgery can be highly advantageous. Patients will likely have less blood loss, less post-operative pain, faster recoveries, and fewer complications compared to open surgery and potentially even laparoscopy. However, until larger, well-designed observational studies or randomized control trials are completed which report long-term outcomes, we cannot definitively state the superiority of robotic surgery over other surgical methods.
Bibliographic Details
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/852061; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22190948; http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ogi/2011/852061/; https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/P20160523006-201112-201704190009-201704190009-178-206; https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/852061; https://www.hindawi.com:443/journals/ogi/2011/852061/
Hindawi Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know