A comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control association studies to evaluate polymorphisms associated with the risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, ISSN: 1055-9965, Vol: 25, Issue: 4, Page: 700-713
2016
- 20Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef18
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Background: Linkage analyses and association studies suggested that inherited genetic variations play a role in the development of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We combined the results from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) performed by our group and frompublished studies onDTC. With a first approach, we evaluated whether a SNP published as associated with the risk of DTC could replicate in our GWAS (using FDR as adjustment for multiple comparisons). With the second approach, meta-analyses were performed between literature and GWAS when both sources suggested an association, increasing the statistical power of the analysis. Results: rs1799814 (CYP1A1), rs1121980 (FTO), and 3 SNPs within 9q22 (rs965513, rs7048394, and rs894673) replicated the associations described in the literature. In addition, the meta-analyses between literature and GWAS revealed 10 more SNPs within 9q22, six within FTO, two within SOD1, and single variations within HUS1, WDR3, UGT2B7, ALOX12, TICAM1, ATG16L1, HDAC4, PIK3CA, SULF1, IL11RA, VEGFA, and 1p31.3, 2q35, 8p12, and 14q13. Conclusion: This analysis confirmed several published risk loci that could be involved in DTC predisposition. Impact: These findings provide evidence for the role of germline variants in DTC etiology and are consistent with a polygenic model of the disease.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84962433786&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0652; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843521; https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/25/4/700/71053/A-Comprehensive-Meta-analysis-of-Case-Control; http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0652; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0652; https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0652; https://cebp.aacrjournals.org/content/25/4/700
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know