When faces signal danger: Event-related potentials to emotional facial expressions in animal phobics
Neuropsychobiology, ISSN: 0302-282X, Vol: 62, Issue: 4, Page: 235-244
2010
- 16Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef8
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 64
Article Description
Attentional bias research indicates that specific phobics prioritize the processing of disorder-relevant stimuli, although the time course of attentional allocation to the phobic threat remains unclear. The present study employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether a processing bias also exists towards specific facial expressions that are able to signal potential phobic cues in the environment. Fifteen women with snake phobia and 15 healthy controls performed an attention-shifting task in which angry, fearful, disgusted and neutral faces were presented as emotional cues. ERP to facial expressions and reaction times to target stimuli were collected during the task. The P200 amplitude was significantly lower in phobics than in controls, specifically in response to facial expressions of fear and disgust. Such reduction in cortical activity may reflect reduced processing associated with rapid cognitive avoidance. Such an avoidance response would not be determined by the threat value of the face stimuli per se, but rather by the ability of fearful and disgusted faces to avert attention by signaling a possible phobic threat in the surrounding area. In addition, phobics showed relatively greater positivity to negative than neutral facial expressions in the later processing stages, indicating a general hypervigilant processing mode. © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77955539561&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000319950; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20714173; https://karger.com/NPS/article/doi/10.1159/000319950; https://www.karger.com/?doi=10.1159/000319950; https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/319950
S. Karger AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know