Conservative treatment and rotator cuff tear progression
Medicine and Sport Science, ISSN: 0254-5020, Vol: 57, Page: 90-99
2012
- 55Citations
- 174Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations55
- Citation Indexes53
- 53
- CrossRef43
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures174
- Readers174
- 174
Book Chapter Description
There is no definite consensus on the best management for patients with rotator cuff tears. No randomized controlled studies have compared the outcome of surgical versus conservative treatment. The described successful rate of conservative treatment varies widely, from 33 to 92%. Even though current evidence is not sufficient to allow definitive conclusions on conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears, non-operative management is often recommended in such patients. Prognostic factors seem to be clinical presentation, duration of symptoms and tear size. The best programme for conservative treatment is not defined. Physical therapy consists of stretching and strengthening exercises. The characteristics of exercise programmes are not standardized. In clinical practice, intra-articular injections are commonly used for treatment of shoulder pain. Systemic pharmacotherapy for patients with shoulder pain consists of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recently, cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitors have been introduced for management of shoulder pain. To date, few randomized controlled trials are available on conservative management of rotator cuff tears, and therefore further studies are required to clarify its role in such patients. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926106495&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000328910; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21986048; https://karger.com/books/book/2751/chapter/5790392; http://www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000328910; https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/328910
S. Karger AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know