Bioactive properties of nanostructured porous silicon for enhancing electrode to neuron interfaces
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, ISSN: 1568-5624, Vol: 18, Issue: 10, Page: 1263-1281
2007
- 56Citations
- 71Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations56
- Citation Indexes56
- 56
- CrossRef42
- Captures71
- Readers71
- 71
Article Description
Many different types of microelectrodes have been developed for use as a direct brain-machine interface (BMI) to chronically recording single-neuron action potentials from ensembles of neurons. Unfortunately, the recordings from these microelectrode devices are not consistent and often last for only on the order of months. For most microelectrode types, the loss of these recordings is not due to failure of the electrodes, but most likely due to damage to surrounding tissue that results in the formation of non-conductive glial scar. Since the extracellular matrix consists of nanostructured fibrous protein assemblies, we have postulated that neurons may prefer a more complex surface structure than the smooth surface typical of thin-film microelectrodes. This porous structure could then act as a drug-delivery reservoir to deliver bioactive agents to aid in the repair or survival of cells around the microelectrode, further reducing the glial scar. We, therefore, investigated the suitability of a nano-porous silicon surface layer to increase the biocompatibility of our thin film ceramic-insulated multisite electrodes. In vitro testing demonstrated increased extension of neurites from PC12 pheochromocytoma cells on porous silicon surfaces compared to smooth silicon sufaces. Moreover, the size of the pores and the pore coverage did not interfere with this bioactive surface property, suggesting that large highly porous nanostructured surfaces can be used for drug delivery. The most porous nano-porous surfaces were then tested in vivo and found to be more biocompatible than smooth surface, producing less glial activation and allowing more neurons to remain close to the device. Collectively, these results support our hypothesis that nano-porous silicon may be an ideal material to improve biocompatibility of chronically implanted microelectrodes. The next step in this work will be to apply these surfaces to active microelectrodes, use them to deliver bioactive agents, and test that they do improve neural recordings. © 2007 VSP.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know