Symptom Score: A New Instrument to Assess Orthostatic Intolerance in Children and Adolescents
Journal of Child Neurology, ISSN: 1708-8283, Vol: 35, Issue: 12, Page: 835-843
2020
- 5Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
Objective: To develop an orthostatic intolerance symptom scoring system to assess orthostatic intolerance and then to compare the symptom score among different head-up tilt test responses. Methods: 272 subjects (5-18 years) presenting with orthostatic intolerance symptoms finished questionnaire and head-up tilt test. According to head-up tilt test hemodynamic responses, the subjects were divided into head-up tilt test negative, vasovagal syncope, and postural tachycardia syndrome groups. Results: We built up a symptom score according to the frequency of dizziness, headache, blurred vision, palpitations, chest discomfort, gastrointestinal symptoms, profuse perspiration, and syncope. The median score in postural tachycardia syndrome subjects was highest. A score of 2.5 for predicting vasovagal syncope yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 50.3%, a score of 5.5 for predicting postural tachycardia syndrome yielded a sensitivity of 69.7% and specificity of 72.0%. Furthermore, the median score in postural tachycardia syndrome subjects was significantly higher than that in head-up tilt test negative subjects with heart rate increment of 30-39 beats/min (P '.01). Conclusions: This suggests that the symptom score has some predictive value in head-up tilt test results, which can be served as a preliminary assessment instrument.
Bibliographic Details
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know