Artificial Neural Network–Based Analysis of High-Throughput Screening Data for Improved Prediction of Active Compounds
SLAS Discovery, ISSN: 2472-5552, Vol: 14, Issue: 10, Page: 1236-1244
2009
- 10Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef6
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are trained using high-throughput screening (HTS) data to recover active compounds from a large data set. Improved classification performance was obtained on combining predictions made by multiple ANNs. The HTS data, acquired from a methionine aminopeptidases inhibition study, consisted of a library of 43,347 compounds, and the ratio of active to nonactive compounds, R A/N, was 0.0321. Back-propagation ANNs were trained and validated using principal components derived from the physicochemical features of the compounds. On selecting the training parameters carefully, an ANN recovers one-third of all active compounds from the validation set with a 3-fold gain in R A/N value. Further gains in R A/N values were obtained upon combining the predictions made by a number of ANNs. The generalization property of the back-propagation ANNs was used to train those ANNs with the same training samples, after being initialized with different sets of random weights. As a result, only 10% of all available compounds were needed for training and validation, and the rest of the data set was screened with more than a 10-fold gain of the original R A/N value. Thus, ANNs trained with limited HTS data might become useful in recovering active compounds from large data sets.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2472555222081564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087057109351312; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=71949128923&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19940083; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2472555222081564; http://jbx.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1087057109351312; http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/14/10/1236
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know