The Quality of Sustainability Reports and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence From Brazilian Listed Companies
SAGE Open, ISSN: 2158-2440, Vol: 7, Issue: 2
2017
- 52Citations
- 555Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Would Legislation Make Campus Free Speech Less Free?
Here’s your spot. Blather at will. Around the United States, state lawmakers have been talking about – and legislating – ways intended to protect free speech on college campuses. The Wisconsin State Assembly, for example, recently passed a campus speech bill that would require public colleges and universities to punish students who disrupt campus speakers. The legislation is now heading to the Sta
Article Description
Corporate sustainability is essential to long-term corporate success and for ensuring markets deliver value across society, and despite its importance, there is no clear consensus as to whether the financial performance of companies relates to their sustainability performance. The objectives of this study are to verify whether the sustainability reporting quality would affect corporate financial performance (CFP) among the firms listed on Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) and to examine the quality of information disclosed in their sustainability reports (SR). The sample is composed of all firms listed on ISE for the period 2008 to 2014. This study considered accounting and market-based indicators and control variables. There is no clear consensus as to whether the financial performance of companies listed in sustainability indices relates to their sustainability performance. The main findings are as follows: There is no association between accounting and market-based variables and the reporting quality, and although the quality disclosure is improving throughout the years studied, the scores are still low. This is also true in the three dimensions of sustainability. We are not aware of studies examining the relationship between CFP and sustainability reporting quality, and this is the main contribution.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know