Cross-species gene normalization by species inference
BMC Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1471-2105, Vol: 12, Issue: SUPPL. 8, Page: S5
2011
- 57Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations57
- Citation Indexes57
- 57
- CrossRef29
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
Article Description
Background: To access and utilize the rich information contained in the biomedical literature, the ability to recognize and normalize gene mentions referenced in the literature is crucial. In this paper, we focus on improvements to the accuracy of gene normalization in cases where species information is not provided. Gene names are often ambiguous, in that they can refer to the genes of many species. Therefore, gene normalization is a difficult challenge.Methods: We define " gene normalization" as a series of tasks involving several issues, including gene name recognition, species assignation and species-specific gene normalization. We propose an integrated method, GenNorm, consisting of three modules to handle the issues of this task. Every issue can affect overall performance, though the most important is species assignation. Clearly, correct identification of the species can decrease the ambiguity of orthologous genes.Results: In experiments, the proposed model attained the top-1 threshold average precision (TAP-k) scores of 0.3297 (k=5), 0.3538 (k=10), and 0.3535 (k=20) when tested against 50 articles that had been selected for their difficulty and the most divergent results from pooled team submissions. In the silver-standard-507 evaluation, our TAP-k scores are 0.4591 for k=5, 10, and 20 and were ranked 2, 2, and 3 respectively.Availability: A web service and input, output formats of GenNorm are available at http://ikmbio.csie.ncku.edu.tw/GN/. © 2011 Wei and Kao; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053432627&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-s8-s5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151999; http://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S8-S5; https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S8-S5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-s8-s5
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know