Long working hours and pregnancy complications: Women physicians survey in japan
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, ISSN: 1471-2393, Vol: 14, Issue: 1, Page: 245
2014
- 39Citations
- 63Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations39
- Citation Indexes39
- 39
- CrossRef19
- Captures63
- Readers63
- 63
Article Description
Background: Previous studies have investigated the impact of occupational risk factors on health outcomes among physicians. However, few studies have investigated the effects on pregnancy outcomes among physicians. In this study, we examined the association between working hours during pregnancy and pregnancy complications among physicians.Methods: A cross-sectional study was based on a survey conducted in 2009-2011 of 1,684 alumnae (mean age, 44 ± 8 years) who had graduated from 13 private medical schools in Japan. Data on threatened abortion (TA), preterm birth (PTB), and the number of working hours during the first trimester of pregnancy were obtained via retrospective assessments.Results: Of the 939 physicians with a first pregnancy, 15% experienced TA and 12% experienced PTB. Women who experienced TA (mean weekly working hours: 62 h vs. 50 h, P < .0001) or PTB (62 h vs. 50 h, P < .0001) had longer weekly working hours during the first trimester than did those without pregnancy complications. Compared with women who worked 40 hours or less per week, women who worked 71 hours or more per week had a three-fold higher risk of experiencing TA (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-6.0) even after adjusting for medical specialty, maternal age, and current household income. The risk of experiencing PTB was 2.5 times higher (95% CI:1.2-5.2) in women who worked 51-70 hours and 4.2 times higher (95% CI: 1.9-9.2) in women who worked 71 hours or more even after adjusting for specialty, maternal age, and current household income. The trend in the P statistic reflecting the effect of the quartile of hours worked per week (40 hours, 41-50 hours, 51-70 hours, ≥71 hours) on TA or PTB was 0.0001 in the multivariate logistic regression models.Conclusion: These results suggest that working long hours during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with TA and PTB. © 2014 Takeuchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904534739&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25060410; https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245; http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/245; https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245; http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245/fulltext.html; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2393-14-245; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186%2F1471-2393-14-245.pdf
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know