Qualitative inquiry: A method for validating patient perceptions of palliative care while enrolled on a cancer clinical trial
BMC Palliative Care, ISSN: 1472-684X, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 43
2014
- 3Citations
- 80Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures80
- Readers80
- 80
Article Description
Background: Palliative care is a vital component of patient-centered care. It has increasingly become central to the management and care of seriously ill patients by integrating physical, psychosocial, and spiritual supportive services. Through qualitative inquiry, this paper examines cancer patients' perceptions of the process and outcomes of the pain and palliative care consultative services they received while enrolled in a clinical trial. Methods: A qualitative analysis of open-ended questions was conducted from a sub-sample of patients (n = 34) with advanced cancers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of a palliative care consult service. Two open-ended questions focused on patient perceptions of continued participation on their primary cancer clinical trials and their perceptions of interdisciplinary communication. Results: Three overarching themes emerged when asked whether receiving pain and palliative care services made them more likely to remain enrolled in their primary cancer clinical trial: patients' past experiences with care, self-identified personal characteristics and reasons for participation, and the quality of the partnership. Four themes emerged related to interdisciplinary communication including: the importance of developing relationships, facilitating open communication, having quality communication, and uncertainty about communication between the cancer clinical trial and palliative care teams. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the importance of qualitative inquiry methods to explore patient perceptions regarding the efficacy of palliative care services for cancer patients enrolled in a cancer clinical trial. Validation of patient perceptions through qualitative inquiry regarding their pain and palliative care needs can provide insight into areas for future implementation research. Trial registration: NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protection OHSRP5443 and University of Pennsylvania 813365.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84908123741&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684x-13-43; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25276094; http://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43/fulltext.html; https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-684X-13-43; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-684x-13-43
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know