L-alanyl-L-glutamine ingestion maintains performance during a competitive basketball game
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, ISSN: 1550-2783, Vol: 9, Issue: 1, Page: 4
2012
- 35Citations
- 43Usage
- 116Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef16
- Usage43
- Downloads43
- Captures116
- Readers116
- 116
Article Description
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of L-alanyl-L-glutamine (AG) ingestion on basketball performance, including jump power, reaction time, shooting accuracy and fatigue.Methods: Ten women (21.2 ± 1.6 years; height: 177.8 ± 8.7 cm; body mass: 73.5 ± 8.0 kg), all scholarship NCAA Division I basketball players, volunteered for this study. Subjects participated in four trials, each consisting of a 40-min basketball game with controlled time-outs for rehydration. During the first trial (DHY) subjects were not allowed to rehydrate, and the total weight lost during the contest was used to determine fluid replenishment during the subsequent three trials. During one trial subjects consumed only water (W), while during the other two trials subjects consumed the AG supplement mixed in water using either a low dose (1 g per 500 ml) (AG1) or high dose (2 g per 500 ml) (AG2) concentration. All data assessed prior to and following each game were converted into a Δ score (Post results - Pre results). All performance data were then analyzed using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance.Results: During DHY subjects lost 1.72 ± 0.42 kg (2.3%) of their body mass. No differences in fluid intake (1.55 ± 0.43 L) were seen between rehydration trials. A 12.5% (p = 0.016) difference in basketball shooting performance was noted between DHY and AG1 and an 11.1% (p = 0.029) difference was seen between AG1 and W. Visual reaction time was significantly greater following AG1 (p = 0.014) compared to DHY. Differences (p = 0.045) in fatigue, as determined by player loads, were seen only between AG2 and DHY. No differences were seen in peak or mean vertical jump power during any trial.Conclusion: Rehydration with AG appears to maintain basketball skill performance and visual reaction time to a greater extent than water only. © 2012 Hoffman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84862787116&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-9-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22397703; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1186/1550-2783-9-4; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010/2750; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3749&context=facultybib2010; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-9-4; https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1550-2783-9-4; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/22397703; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3316133; https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/1550-2783-9-4; http://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1550-2783-9-4; http://www.jissn.com/content/9/1/4
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know