Altered muscular activation during prone hip extension in women with and without low back pain
Chiropractic and Manual Therapies, ISSN: 2045-709X, Vol: 19, Issue: 1, Page: 18
2011
- 42Citations
- 136Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations42
- Citation Indexes42
- 42
- CrossRef21
- Captures136
- Readers136
- 136
Article Description
Background: Altered movement pattern has been associated with the development of low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity pattern of the ipsilateral erector spinae (IES) and contralateral erectorspinae (CES), gluteus maximus (GM) and hamstring (HAM) muscles during prone hip extension (PHE) test in women with and without LBP. A cross-sectional non-experimental design was used. Methods: Convenience sample of 20 female participated in the study. Subjects were categorized into two groups: With LBP (n = 10) and without LBP (n = 10). The electromyography (EMG) signal amplitude of the tested muscles during PHE (normalized to maximum voluntary electrical activity (MVE)) was measured in the dominant lower extremity in all subjects. Results: Statistical analysis revealed greater normalized EMG signal amplitude in women with LBP compared to non-LBP women. There was significant difference in EMG activity of the IES (P = 0.03) and CES (P = 0.03) between two groups. However, no significant difference was found in EMG signals of the GM (P = 0.11) and HAM (P = 0.14) among two groups. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated altered activation pattern of the lumbo-pelvic muscles during PHE in the women with chronic LBP. This information is important for investigators using PHE as either an evaluation tool or a rehabilitation exercise.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84974777445&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709x-19-18; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838925; http://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2045-709X-19-18; https://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2045-709X-19-18; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709x-19-18; https://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/2045-709X-19-18; http://chiromt.com/content/19/1/18; https://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/2045-709X-19-18; http://www.chiromt.com/content/19/1/18
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know